In assembly, the square brackets [] seem to have the same meaning as * in C programming language. They are used to dereference a pointer.
Dereferencing a pointer means going to refer to a specific memory location to read or write it.
So, it is quite logical to use square brackets in the case of a MOV.
But what is the logical reason why they also use it for LEA?
LEA EAX, [EBP -4], looks like dereferencing a pointer, EBP - 4, to refer to the pointed memory location but it will not read the value contained in the location but rather the address.
I'm a little confused about this. Could you give me the right way to think about this?
Does LEA have any connection with the concept of dereferencing?
Clearly not intended as a memory reading, but mostly as referring to a location of memory not for its value, but for its address.
I wouldn't want this to become a philosophical question.
The LEA instruction is designed to look like a memory access instruction — so can perform all the addressing modes. The difference, of course, as you're noting is that LEA loads the "effective address" rather than a memory value from that location.
Thus, LEA is similar to memory access operations, but specifically, in C terms, is taking the address — so like &a[i] in C. Like in C with &, the result of LEA is always a pointer sized value rather than with real accesses where we can fetch/store a byte, word, etc..
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With