Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
HTML CSS JAVASCRIPT SQL PYTHON PHP BOOTSTRAP JAVA JQUERY R React Kotlin
 

New posts in language-lawyer

Do I still get default copy constructor and operator= if I define ones with non-const arguments?

c++ constants language-lawyer default-copy-constructor

Is scanf guaranteed to not change the value on failure?

c scanf language-lawyer

Constexpr compound assignment operator in clang and gcc

c++ c++11 language-lawyer c++14 constexpr

Confusion around function call resolution

c++ language-lawyer function-calls overload-resolution argument-dependent-lookup

Does the following actually violate the ODR?

c++ static inline language-lawyer one-definition-rule

Are checked guard parameter packs cause of ill-formed programs?

c++ templates language-lawyer variadic-templates

When an `int` at max value and tested with with postfix ++, is code well-defined?

c language-lawyer

Are local class rules aligned to c++14 return type deduction?

c++ c++14 language-lawyer return-type auto

Anonymous temporaries and class template argument deduction - gcc vs clang

c++ language-lawyer c++17 class-template template-argument-deduction

Does reinterpret_casting std::aligned_storage* to T* without std::launder violate strict-aliasing rules? [duplicate]

c++ language-lawyer reinterpret-cast strict-aliasing

Why is int(a) an expression and int(unsigned(a)) a type-id in the example below?

c++ language-lawyer

Template template argument causes compiler error under Clang but not GCC [duplicate]

c++ templates language-lawyer

Is overflow of an unsigned bit field guaranteed to wrap-around?

c++ language-lawyer integer-overflow bit-fields

Default template argument of a class template has no effect if placed after the definition of that class template

c++ language-lawyer

Which guarantees does the C++ standard have when it comes to issuing diagnostic messages?

c++ language-lawyer

Alias of a template. Who's right?

c++ language-lawyer

Can I define a constexpr anonymous/unnamed variable?

c++ language-lawyer c++17 constexpr

How come a new-expression can correctly produce the pointer type, even though it should return void*? [duplicate]

c++ language-lawyer void-pointers new-expression

Are captureless lambdas structural types?

c++ templates lambda language-lawyer c++20

name lookup for typedef is buggy in GNU compiler?

c++ c++11 typedef language-lawyer name-lookup
« Newer Entries Older Entries »