Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Spring Integration: Content based router with default output channel?

I'd like use Spring Integration to implement a content based router that uses a default output channel if the expression value doesn't match any of the mappings. Here's my bean definition:

<int:router input-channel="channel_in" default-output-channel="channel_default" expression="payload.name">
    <int:mapping value="foo" channel="channel_one" />
    <int:mapping value="bar" channel="channel_two" />

However, it seems the default output channel is never used. If the expression evaluates to e.g. 'baz', the router seems to be looking for a channel named 'baz', instead of routing to the 'channel_default' channel:

org.springframework.integration.MessagingException: failed to resolve channel name 'baz'
  Caused by: org.springframework.integration.support.channel.ChannelResolutionException: 
    failed to look up MessageChannel bean with name 'baz'
  Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: 
    No bean named 'baz' is defined

Is what I want at all possible using the XML namespace, or do I need to code up my own implementation?

like image 285
otto.poellath Avatar asked Jul 27 '11 14:07

otto.poellath


2 Answers

Turns out that all I had to to to make this work was to set the router's ignore-channel-name-resolution-failures attribute to false:

<int:router input-channel="channel_in" default-output-channel="channel_default" 
  expression="payload.name" ignore-channel-name-resolution-failures="true">
    <int:mapping value="foo" channel="channel_one" />
    <int:mapping value="bar" channel="channel_two" />
</int:router>

I thought I had tried that before, but I seems I didn't.

like image 192
otto.poellath Avatar answered Oct 24 '22 08:10

otto.poellath


As mentioned in reference docs:

As of Spring Integration 2.1, router parameters have been more standardized across all router implementations. Consequently, a few minor changes may break older Spring Integration based applications.

Since Spring Integration 2.1, the ignore-channel-name-resolution-failures attribute is removed in favor of consolidating its behavior with the resolution-required attribute. Also, the resolution-required attribute now defaults to true.

Prior to these changes, the resolution-required attribute defaulted to false, causing messages to be silently dropped when no channel was resolved and no default-output-channel was set. The new behavior requires at least one resolved channel and, by default, throws a MessageDeliveryException if no channel was determined (or an attempt to send was not successful).

If you do desire to drop messages silently, you can set default-output-channel="nullChannel".

And if you are using Java DSL, the configuration may looks like this:

IntegrationFlows.from("process")
        .<JobExecution, String>route(m -> m.getExitStatus().getExitCode(),
                m -> m.channelMapping(ExitStatus.COMPLETED.getExitCode(), "succeed")
                        .defaultOutputChannel("failed")
                        .resolutionRequired(false))
        .get();
like image 33
m190 Avatar answered Oct 24 '22 06:10

m190