In C++ I have the following two classes that I expose (using Boost) to Python:
struct Foo {
// Empty
};
struct FooContainer {
// I use boost::shared_ptr for compatibility with Boost.Python
vector<boost::shared_ptr<Foo>> foos_;
};
In the Python side I might create a special type of Foo that actually does something instead of being just an empty class, and then add it to a FooContainer:
class Useful(Foo):
def __init__(self, a, b):
self.a = a
self.b = b
x = Useful(3, 5);
# Add 'x' to a `FooContainer`
Back in the C++ side, the FooContainer now has some Foos, but it doesn't know or care that they are from Python. The application runs for a while and the data in the Foo objects changes...
Then I decide I want to save the state of my program so I can load it at a later time. But the problem is that FooContainer doesn't know much about its Foo objects, it doesn't even know that they come from Python and I wouldn't want to pollute my FooContainer with data that doesn't really belong in it (single-responsibility principle and all that).
Do you have any advice on how I should organize my application such that saving and loading data, as well as loading fresh data (ie. not from a state that I saved in the past) can be done in a clear way?
You can use boost::python/pickle, and save the data from python. I only have limited experience with the pickling suite, but it should work provided you override appropriate pickling methods in your classes derived in python (see my answer to this question).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With