Any help with the following problem would be greatly appreciated!
My project contains two packages:
child-component-lib
About.vue written in composition-API-style (with vue2 helper libraries @vue/composition-api and vuex-composition-helpers)RouteConfigviews/About.vue (child)
<template>
  <div class="about">
    <h1>This is an about page (as component lib)</h1>
  </div>
</template>
<script>
import { defineComponent } from "@vue/composition-api";
import { createNamespacedHelpers } from "vuex-composition-helpers";
export default defineComponent({
  components: {},
  setup(_, { root }) {
    const { useGetters, useActions } = createNamespacedHelpers("account"); // error thrown here!
  }
});
</script>
router/index.ts (child)
export const routes: Array<RouteConfig> = [{
    path: "/",
    name: "About",
    component: () => import(/* webpackChunkName: "about" */ "../views/About.vue")
}];
lib.ts (child)
export const routes = require("@/router").routes;
package.json (child)
"scripts": {
  "build": "vue-cli-service build --target lib --name child-component-lib src/lib.ts"
...
parent-app
child-component-lib into its router<router-view />package.json (parent)
"dependencies": {
    "@tholst/child-component-lib": "file:../child-component-lib",
router/index.ts (parent)
import { routes as childComponentRoutes } from "@tholst/child-component-lib";
const routes: Array<RouteConfig> = [...childComponentRoutes];
const router = new VueRouter({routes});    
export default router;
App.vue (parent)
<template>
  <div id="app">
    <Home />
    <router-view />
  </div>
</template>
<script>
import { defineComponent } from "@vue/composition-api";
import Home from "@/views/Home.vue";
export default defineComponent({
  components: {
    Home
  },
  setup(_, { root }) {
    ...
  }
});
</script>
It works without problems.
I see an error output in the console. [Vue warn]: Error in data(): "Error: You must use this function within the "setup()" method, or insert the store as first argument." The error message is misleading, because the error is actually thrown inside setup() method. It can be traced back to getCurrentInstance() returning undefined (inside @vue/composition-api).
About.vue in the parent-app itself (just switch the route, to try it out), i.e., it works when we avoid the import from the built library.vue.config.js, webpack, babel, typescript, ...)git clone [email protected]:tholst/vue-composition-api-comp-lib.git && cd vue-composition-api-comp-lib/child-component-lib && npm install && npm run build && cd ../parent-app/ && npm install && npm run serve
or one by one
git clone [email protected]:tholst/vue-composition-api-comp-lib.git
cd vue-composition-api-comp-lib/child-component-lib
npm install
npm run build
cd ../parent-app/
npm install
npm run serve
[Vue warn]: Error in data(): "Error: You must use this function within the "setup()" method, or insert the store as first argument."
found in
---> <Anonymous>
       <App> at src/App.vue
         <Root>

Node: 14.2.0
npm: 6.14.8
Chrome: 86.0.4240.198
npmPackages:
    @vue/babel-sugar-composition-api-inject-h:  1.2.1 
    @vue/babel-sugar-composition-api-render-instance:  1.2.4 
    ...    
    @vue/cli-overlay:  4.5.8 
    @vue/cli-plugin-babel: 4.5.8 
    @vue/cli-plugin-router: 4.5.8 
    @vue/cli-plugin-typescript: 4.5.8 
    @vue/cli-plugin-vuex:4.5.8 
    @vue/cli-service: 4.5.8 
    @vue/cli-shared-utils:  4.5.8 
    @vue/component-compiler-utils:  3.2.0 
    @vue/composition-api: 1.0.0-beta.19 
    @vue/preload-webpack-plugin:  1.1.2 
    typescript: 3.9.7 
    vue: 2.6.12 
    vue-loader:  15.9.5 (16.0.0-rc.1)
    vue-router: 3.4.9
    vue-template-compiler: 2.6.12 
    vue-template-es2015-compiler:  1.9.1 
    vuex: 3.5.1 
    vuex-composition-helpers: 1.0.21 
npmGlobalPackages:
    @vue/cli: 4.5.8
I finally understood what the problems were. First, there was the actual problem. Second, there was a problem in the local development setup that made solutions to the actual problem look like they were not working.
The child-component-lib was bundling their own versions of the npm packages @vue/composition-api and vuex-composition-helpers. This had the following effect: When I was running the parent-app there were actually two instances of those libraries and the vue component from the child-component-lib was accessing the wrong object that had not been properly initialized.
The solution was to prevent the bundling of those libraries in the child-component-lib, by
making them devDependencies and peerDependencies.
instructing webpack not to bundle them on npm run build.
package.json
"dependencies": {
    ...
},
"devDependencies": {
    "@vue/composition-api": "^1.0.0-beta.19",
    "vuex-composition-helpers": "^1.0.21",
    ...
},
"peerDependencies": {
    "@vue/composition-api": "^1.0.0-beta.19",
    "vuex-composition-helpers": "^1.0.21"
},
vue.config.js
configureWebpack: {
    externals: {
        "@vue/composition-api": "@vue/composition-api",
        "vuex-composition-helpers": "vuex-composition-helpers"
    },
    ...
}
I was trying to fix this problem locally, without actually publishing the package. And it seemed to work, because I was seeing the same problem locally that I also saw in the published packages.
I did local development by directly linking the parent-app and child-component-libs. I tried both
a direct folder dependency
package.json
"dependencies": {
    "@tholst/child-component-lib": "file:../child-component-lib",
},
npm link
cd child-component-lib
npm link
cd ../parent-app
npm link @tholst/child-component-lib
Both approaches have the effect that they actually import (=symlink to) the child-component-lib's folder with all files and folders (instead of only the files that would be published in the npm package).
And that meant the following: Even though I had excluded the two composition-API libs from the bundle and made them dev/peer dependencies (see solution to actual problem), they were still installed and present in the child-component-lib's node_modules. And that node_modules folder was symlinked into the parent-app package. And in this way the child-component-lib still had access to their own copy of the libraries that we wanted to exclude from the build (see actual problem). And I was still seeing the error as before.
And this way my local development approach obscured the fact that the solution to the actual problem was actually working.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With