I have a data.table like:
library(data.table)
widgets <- data.table(serial_no=1:100, 
                      color=rep_len(c("red","green","blue","black"),length.out=100),
                      style=rep_len(c("round","pointy","flat"),length.out=100),
                      weight=rep_len(1:5,length.out=100) )
Although I am not sure this is the most data.table way, I can calculate subgroup frequency by group using table and length in a single step-- for example, to answer the question "What percent of red widgets are round?"
edit: this code does not provide the right answer
# example A
widgets[, list(style = unique(style), 
               style_pct_of_color_by_count = 
                 as.numeric(table(style)/length(style)) ), by=color]
#    color  style style_pct_of_color_by_count
# 1:   red  round                        0.32
# 2:   red pointy                        0.32
# 3:   red   flat                        0.36
# 4: green pointy                        0.32
# ...
But I can't use that approach to answer questions like "By weight, what percent of red widgets are round?" I can only come up with a two-step approach:
# example B
widgets[,list(cs_weight=sum(weight)),by=list(color,style)][,list(style, style_pct_of_color_by_weight=cs_weight/sum(cs_weight)),by=color]
#    color  style style_pct_of_color_by_weight
# 1:   red  round                    0.3466667
# 2:   red pointy                    0.3466667
# 3:   red   flat                    0.3066667
# 4: green pointy                    0.3333333
# ...
I'm looking for a single-step approach to B, and A if improvable, in an explanation that deepens my understanding of data.table syntax for by-group operations.  Please note that this question is different from Weighted sum of variables by groups with data.table because mine involves subgroups and avoiding multiple steps.  TYVM.
This is almost a single step:
# A
widgets[,{
    totwt = .N
    .SD[,.(frac=.N/totwt),by=style]
},by=color]
    # color  style frac
 # 1:   red  round 0.36
 # 2:   red pointy 0.32
 # 3:   red   flat 0.32
 # 4: green pointy 0.36
 # 5: green   flat 0.32
 # 6: green  round 0.32
 # 7:  blue   flat 0.36
 # 8:  blue  round 0.32
 # 9:  blue pointy 0.32
# 10: black  round 0.36
# 11: black pointy 0.32
# 12: black   flat 0.32
# B
widgets[,{
    totwt = sum(weight)
    .SD[,.(frac=sum(weight)/totwt),by=style]
},by=color]
 #    color  style      frac
 # 1:   red  round 0.3466667
 # 2:   red pointy 0.3466667
 # 3:   red   flat 0.3066667
 # 4: green pointy 0.3333333
 # 5: green   flat 0.3200000
 # 6: green  round 0.3466667
 # 7:  blue   flat 0.3866667
 # 8:  blue  round 0.2933333
 # 9:  blue pointy 0.3200000
# 10: black  round 0.3733333
# 11: black pointy 0.3333333
# 12: black   flat 0.2933333
How it works: Construct your denominator for the top-level group (color) before going to the finer group (color with style) to tabulate.
Alternatives. If styles repeat within each color and this is only for display purposes, try a table:
# A
widgets[,
  prop.table(table(color,style),1)
]
#        style
# color   flat pointy round
#   black 0.32   0.32  0.36
#   blue  0.36   0.32  0.32
#   green 0.32   0.36  0.32
#   red   0.32   0.32  0.36
# B
widgets[,rep(1L,sum(weight)),by=.(color,style)][,
  prop.table(table(color,style),1)
]
#        style
# color        flat    pointy     round
#   black 0.2933333 0.3333333 0.3733333
#   blue  0.3866667 0.3200000 0.2933333
#   green 0.3200000 0.3333333 0.3466667
#   red   0.3066667 0.3466667 0.3466667
For B, this expands the data so that there is one observation for each unit of weight. With large data, such an expansion would be a bad idea (since it costs so much memory). Also, weight has to be an integer; otherwise, its sum will be silently truncated to one (e.g., try rep(1,2.5) # [1] 1 1).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With