I am attempting to make a chord diagram of a fairly large 18*65 table (not every cell has a value).
I have generated the image I want but the quallity of it is nothing like what is shown on the github seen below:

I figure maybe the number of cells needing to be plotted may cause problems but otherwise I am not sure why i get such a difference:
circos.par(gap.after = c(rep(2, ncol(chord_data)-1), 10, rep(2, 8-1), 5, rep(2, 10-1), 5, rep(2, 5-1), 5, rep(2, 3-1), 5, rep(2, 1), 5, rep(2, 12-1), 5, rep(2, 10-1), 5, rep(2, 6-1), 5, rep(2, 7-1), rep(2, 3-1), 10))
png(file = "antismash_by_type.png", width = 800, height = 800)
chordDiagram(chord_data,
grid.col = grid.col,
order = order,
annotationTrack = "grid",
preAllocateTracks = 1)
circos.track(track.index = 1, panel.fun = function(x, y) {
circos.text(CELL_META$xcenter, CELL_META$ylim[1], CELL_META$sector.index,
facing = "clockwise", niceFacing = TRUE, adj = c(0, 0.5))
}, bg.border = NA)
dev.off()

Secondly my chords do not appear to be scaling to the value of the cell which ranges from 0-100 and from what I read this is meant to occure by default but does not appear to be.
You can use res argument in png() function to improve image quality.
png('image.png', height = 37*350, width = 40*350, res=600 )
You can adjust the height and width according to the image size. You should provide some reproducible data for scaling chords.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With