I have the following scope for my class called Collection:
scope :with_missing_coins, joins(:coins).where("coins.is_missing = ?", true) I can run Collection.with_missing_coins.count and get a result back -- it works great! Currently, if I want to get collections without missing coins, I add another scope:
scope :without_missing_coins, joins(:coins).where("coins.is_missing = ?", false) I find myself writing a lot of these "opposite" scopes. Is it possible to get the opposite of a scope without sacrificing readability or resorting to a lambda/method (that takes true or false as a parameter)?
Something like this:
Collection.!with_missing_coins
In Rails 4.2, you can do:
scope :original, -> { ... original scope definition ... } scope :not_original, -> { where.not(id: original) } It'll use a subquery.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With