Two things every C++ tutorial mentions early on:
int narrow{1.7}; // error: narrowing conversion of '1.7e+0' from 'double' to 'int'
float some_float{1.7f};
However, when working with the g++ compiler on Windows, I've discovered something odd -
float narrow{1.7}; // still a float despite no f postfix
double not_narrow{1.7}; // actually a double
This code compiles without any errors, and sizeof(narrow) returns 4, where sizeof(not_narrow) returns 8, as expected.
Hovering over 1.7, VSCode identifies it as a double literal ~=1.699999999999999956, but float has then narrowed it to ~=1.700000048.
I thought it might be simply that 1.7 is both valid as a float and a double, so I tried
float narrow{1.699999999999999956};
but this produces an identical result.
Why doesn't braced initialization throw an error (warning, diagnostic message, anything) here for narrowing a double literal to a float? Is this g++ specific, or a quirk of C++ in general? I'd love to understand better.
A conversion from a floating-point type to a shorter floating-point type is not a narrowing conversion if "the source is a constant expression and the actual value after conversion is within the range of values that can be represented (even if it cannot be represented exactly)" (C++20 [dcl.init.list]/7.2).
If you think about it, double{1.7} and float{1.7} are most likely both inexact. But if you write the latter, it's reasonable to assume that you mean it, and there's not much to be gained from prohibiting this.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With