Looking at this React Router Dom v4 example https://reacttraining.com/react-router/web/example/auth-workflow I see that PrivateRoute component destructures a rest prop like this
const PrivateRoute = ({ component: Component, ...rest }) => ( <Route {...rest} render={props => ( fakeAuth.isAuthenticated ? ( <Component {...props}/> ) : ( <Redirect to={{ pathname: '/login', state: { from: props.location } }}/> ) )}/> ) I want to be certain that { component: Component, ...rest } means:
From
props, get the Component prop and then all other props are given to you, and renamepropstorestso you can avoid naming issues with the props passed to the Routerenderfunction
Am I right?
(three dots in JavaScript) is called the Spread Syntax or Spread Operator. This allows an iterable such as an array expression or string to be expanded or an object expression to be expanded wherever placed. This is not specific to React. It is a JavaScript operator.
Sorry, I realized my first answer (while hopefully still providing useful/additional context) doesn't answer your question. Let me try again.
You ask:
I want to be certain that
{ component: Component, ...rest }means:From
props, get theComponentprop and then all otherpropsgiven to you, and renamepropstorestso you can avoid naming issues with thepropspassed to the Routerenderfunction
Your interpretation is not quite correct. Based on your thoughts though, it sounds like you're at least aware of the fact that what is happening here amounts to some sort of object destructuring (see second answer and comments there for more clarification).
To give an accurate explanation, let's break down the { component: Component, ...rest } expression into two separate operations:
component property defined on props (Note: lowercase component) and assign it to a new location in state we call Component (Note: capital Component).props object and collect them inside an argument called rest.The important point is that you're NOT renaming props to rest. (And nor does it have to do with trying to "avoid naming issues with the props passed to the Route render function".)
rest === props; // => false You're simply pulling off the rest (hence why the argument is named that) of the properties defined on your props object into a new argument called rest.
const myObj = { name: 'John Doe', age: 35, sex: 'M', dob: new Date(1990, 1, 1) }; For this example, it may help to just think of props as having the same structure (i.e., properties and values) as shown in myObj. Now, let's write the following assignment.
const { name: Username, ...rest } = myObj The statement above amounts to both the declaration and assignment of two variables (or, I guess, constants). The statement can be thought out as:
Take property
namedefined onmyObjand assign its value to a new variable we callUsername. Then, take whatever other properties were defined onmyObj(i.e.,age,sexanddob) and collect them into a new object assigned to the variable we namerest.
Logging Username and rest to the console would confirm this. We have the following:
console.log(Username); // => John Doe console.log(rest); // => { age: 35, sex: 'M', dob: Mon Jan 01 1990 00:00:00 GMT-0800 (PST) } Why go through the trouble of pulling off the
componentproperty only to rename itComponentwith a capital letter "C"?
Yeah, it seems pretty trivial. And, while it is a standard React practice, there's a reason all of Facebook's documentation on its framework is written as such. Namely, capitalizing custom components rendered with JSX is less a practice per se than it is a necessity. React, or more properly, JSX is case-sensitive. Custom components inserted without a capitalized first letter are not rendered to the DOM. This is just how React has defined itself to identify custom components. Thus, had the example not additionally renamed the component property that was pulled off of props to Component, the <component {...props} /> expression would fail to render properly.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With