As in the unofficial meteor faq, I think it pretty much explains how to structure a large app:
Where should I put my files?
The example apps in meteor are very simple, and don’t provide much insight. Here’s my current thinking on the best way to do it: (any suggestions/improvements are very welcome!)
lib/ # <- any common code for client/server. lib/environment.js # <- general configuration lib/methods.js # <- Meteor.method definitions lib/external # <- common code from someone else ## Note that js files in lib folders are loaded before other js files. collections/ # <- definitions of collections and methods on them (could be models/) client/lib # <- client specific libraries (also loaded first) client/lib/environment.js # <- configuration of any client side packages client/lib/helpers # <- any helpers (handlebars or otherwise) that are used often in view files client/application.js # <- subscriptions, basic Meteor.startup code. client/index.html # <- toplevel html client/index.js # <- and its JS client/views/<page>.html # <- the templates specific to a single page client/views/<page>.js # <- and the JS to hook it up client/views/<type>/ # <- if you find you have a lot of views of the same object type client/stylesheets/ # <- css / styl / less files server/publications.js # <- Meteor.publish definitions server/lib/environment.js # <- configuration of server side packages public/ # <- static files, such as images, that are served directly. tests/ # <- unit test files (won't be loaded on client or server)
For larger applications, discrete functionality can be broken up into sub-directories which are themselves organized using the same pattern. The idea here is that eventually module of functionality could be factored out into a separate smart package, and ideally, shared around.
feature-foo/ # <- all functionality related to feature 'foo' feature-foo/lib/ # <- common code feature-foo/models/ # <- model definitions feature-foo/client/ # <- files only sent to the client feature-foo/server/ # <- files only available on the server
Find out more: Unofficial Meteor FAQ
I agree with yagooar, but instead of:
client/application.js
Use:
client/main.js
main.* files are loaded last. This will help ensure that you do not have any load order issues. See the Meteor documentation, http://docs.meteor.com/#structuringyourapp, for more details.
Meteor was designed so you structure your app pretty much any way you want to. So if you don't like your structure, you can just move a file to a new directory, or even split one file into many pieces, and to Meteor its pretty much all the same. Just note the special treatment of client, server, and public directories as specified in the main documentation page: http://docs.meteor.com/.
Just lumping everything together in one HTML fill will certainly not emerge as a best practice.
Here's an example of one possible structure: in one of my apps, a discussion forum, I organize by module or "page type" (home, forum, topic, comment), putting .css, .html, and .js file for each page type together in one directory. I also have a "base" module, which contains common .css and .js code and the master template, which uses {{renderPage}} to render one of the other modules depending on the router.
my_app/
lib/
router.js
client/
base/
base.html
base.js
base.css
home/
home.html
home.js
home.css
forum/
forum.html
forum.js
forum.css
topic/
topic.html
topic.js
topic.css
comment/
comment.html
comment.js
comment.css
You could also organize by function
my_app/
lib/
router.js
templates/
base.html
home.html
forum.html
topic.html
comment.html
js/
base.js
home.js
forum.js
topic.js
comment.js
css/
base.css
home.css
forum.css
topic.css
comment.css
I hope some more specific best practice structures and naming conventions do emerge though.
Lump it all together! From the docs:
> HTML files in a Meteor application are treated quite a bit differently
> from a server-side framework. Meteor scans all the HTML files in your
> directory for three top-level elements: <head>, <body>, and
> <template>. The head and body sections are seperately concatenated
> into a single head and body, which are transmitted to the client on
> initial page load.
>
> Template sections, on the other hand, are converted into JavaScript
> functions, available under the Template namespace. It's a really
> convenient way to ship HTML templates to the client. See the templates
> section for more.
For everybody who's Googling on this topic:
The em
command line tool (by EventedMind, the guys behind the Iron Router) is very helpful when rigging a new Meteor App. It will create a nice file/folder structure. If you already work on an app and want to re-organize it, just set up a new project with em
and you can use it for inspiration.
See: https://github.com/EventedMind/em
And here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17509551/what-is-the-best-way-to-organize-templates-in-meteor-js
I think the file structure from the Discover Meteor Book is really good and a solid start.
/app:
/client
main.html
main.js
/server
/public
/lib
/collections
Of course not everything fits in this approach, but in large apps you'll have a lot of functionalities that can be isolated. Anything separable and reusable fits in packages, the rest goes in the usual directory structure, as mentioned in other answers. Even if you don't make packages to avoid the overhead, structuring the code in a modular manner is a good idea (see these suggestions)
Meteor allows a fine-grained control over how you load your files (loading order, where: client/server/both) and what the package exports.
I especially find very handy the easy way to share the logic between the related files. Say, for example, you wanna make some util function and use in different files. You just make it "global" (without the var
) and Meteor will wrap it in the namespace of the package, so it will not pollute the global namespace
Here's the official doc
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With