For what I know, C++ defines map<a,b>::value_type as pair<const a,b>
What will happen if I use a pointer type as key type in map, i.e., is
std::map<const char*,int>::value_type::first_type = const char*
as I would expect from definition above or
std::map<const char*,int>::value_type::first_type = const char* const
as would be more logical (since otherwise i would be allowed to change key value from a map iterator)?
Your reasoning is correct, value_type::first would be char const * const.
There is a common source of confusion in thinking that const T when T is a type * is const type *, but that is not so. Unlike macros, typedefs are not text substitution, nor are template arguments. When you do const T, if T is a typedef or template argument, you are adding a const to the type as a whole.
That is the one reason why I like to write my consts at the right of the type, as it causes less confusion: T const *, add an extra const, get T const * const.
If a is const char*, then const a is indeed const char* const.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With