How to write in a standard conforming manner avs_term_rearranged(AVs, T, AVsR) with given AVs and T such that AVsR is a permutation of AVs with the elements arranged in same order as their variables occur in left-to-right order in T.
AVs is a list of elements of the form A = V where A is an atom designating a variable name like 'X' and V is a corresponding variable. Such lists are produced by read_term/2,3 with the read-option variable_names/1 (7.10.3). Additionally, the precise order of elements is not defined.
| ?- read_term(T,[variable_names(AVs)]). A+B+A+_+C. AVs = ['A'=A,'B'=B,'C'=C] T = A+B+A+_+C T is a term that contains all variables of AVs plus some more.
Note that in a standard conforming program one cannot rely on the term order for variables (7.2.1):
7.2.1 Variable
If
XandYare variables which are not identical thenXterm_precedesYshall be implementation dependent except that during the creation of a sorted list (7.1.6.5, 8.10.3.1 j) the ordering shall remain constant.NOTE — If
XandYare both anonymous variables then they are not identical terms (see 6.1.2 a).
Consider as an example from 8.4.3.4:
sort([f(U),U,U,f(V),f(U),V],L). Succeeds, unifying L with [U,V,f(U),f(V)] or [V,U,f(V),f(U)]. [The solution is implementation dependent.] So there are two possible ways how sort/2 will work, and one cannot even rely on the success of:
sort([f(U),U,U,f(V),f(U),V],L), sort(L, K), L == K. As an example:
?- avs_term_rearranged(['A'=A,'B'=B,'C'=C], A+C+F+B, AVsR). AVsR = ['A'=A,'C'=C,'B'=B].
avs_term_rearranged(AVs, T, AVsR) :- term_variables(T, Vs), copy_term(Vs+AVs, Vs1+AVs1), bind_names(AVs1), build_vn_list(Vs, Vs1, AVsR). bind_names([]). bind_names([N=V|AVs]) :- N = V, bind_names(AVs). build_vn_list([], [], []). build_vn_list([V|Vs],[N|Ns],NVs) :- ( atom(N) -> NVs = [N=V|NVs1] ; var(N) -> NVs = NVs1 ), build_vn_list(Vs, Ns, NVs1).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With