I am trying to sample data from a list of integers. The tricky part is that each sample should have a different size to emulate some other data I have. I am doing a for loop right now that can do the job, but I was just wondering if there are faster ways that I am not aware of.
Since I think random.sample is supposed to be fast, I am doing:
result = []
for i in range(100000):
size = list_of_sizes[i]
result.append(random.sample(data, size))
So the result I get is something like:
>>>list_of_sizes
[3, 4, 1, 2,...]
>>>result
[[1, 2, 3],
[3, 6, 2, 8],
[9],
[10, 100],
...]
I have tried using np.random.choice(data, size, replace=False) and random.sample(data, k=size), but they don't allow giving an array of different sizes to vectorize the operation (when np.random.choice takes an array in the size parameter, it creates a tensor whose output's shape is that of size, but not an array of samples). Ideally, I would be expecting something like:
>>>np.random.choice(data, list_of_sizes, replace=False)
[[1, 2, 3],
[3, 6, 2, 8],
[9],
[10, 100],
...]
It seems that np.random.choice is indeed not optimized for choice with replacement. However, you can get better performance by using Generator.choice, as discussed here.
I see a 14x speedup for your parameters:
data = np.arange(10**6)
sample_sizes = np.random.randint(1, 70_000, 100)
def f(data, sample_sizes):
result = []
for s in sample_sizes:
result.append(np.random.choice(data, s, replace=False))
def f2(data, sample_sizes):
g = np.random.Generator(np.random.PCG64())
n = data.shape[0]
return [data[g.choice(n, k, replace=False)] for k in sample_sizes]
%timeit f(data, sample_sizes)
%timeit f2(data, sample_sizes)
1 loop, best of 3: 5.18 s per loop
1 loop, best of 3: 375 ms per loop
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With