I have a directed, bipartite graph g
with 215473 vertices and 2326714 edges. When creating a bipartite.projection
of g
, I keep running out of memory (it uses ~35 gig of RAM before crashing).
I tried to calculate how much memory I need, by following a previous thread on nongnu.org.
From the information provided in this thread, to store a graph in memory costs (in bytes):
(4*|E|+2*|V|) * 8 + 4*|V|
To calculate the projection requires the following memory (in bytes):
16*|V| + (2*|V|+2*|E|) * 8
Thus, for my graph g
, it would cost:
((4*2326714+2*215473) * 8 + 4*215473) + (16*215473 + (2*215473+2*2326714) * 8)
= 78764308 + 44122560
= 122886868 (bytes)
= 122.886868 (mb)
Clearly, this isn't correct, and I must be doing something wrong.
Can anyone please help figure out how to create a bipartite projection of my graph?
Working with sparse matrices could possibly solve your problem.
# Load tiny toy data as edgelist
df <- data.frame( person =
c('Sam','Sam','Sam','Greg','Tom','Tom','Tom','Mary','Mary'), group =
c('a','b','c','a','b','c','d','b','d'), stringsAsFactors = F)
# Transform data to a sparse matrix
library(Matrix)
A <- Matrix::sparseMatrix(nrow=length(unique(df$person)),
ncol=length(unique(df$group)),
i = as.numeric(factor(df$person)),
j = as.numeric(factor(df$group)),
x = rep(1, length(as.numeric(df$person))) )
row.names(A) <- levels(factor(df$person))
colnames(A) <- levels(factor(df$group))
To do the projection you have acutally multiple possiblities, here are two:
# Use base r
Arow <- tcrossprod(A)
# Alternatively, if you want to project on the other mode:
Acol <- tcrossprod(t(A))
# Use the igraph package, which works with sparse matrices
library(igraph)
g <- graph.incidence(A)
# The command bipartite.projection does both possible projections at once
proj <- bipartite.projection(g)
#proj[[1]]
#proj[[2]]
You can also read-in the data and do the transformation within the spMatrix
command by using data.table
, which will speed up those operations as well.
UPDATE:
Here is an example with a larger graph and some memory benchmarks:
# Load packages
library(data.table)
library(igraph)
# Scientific collaboration dataset
# Descriptives as reported on https://toreopsahl.com/datasets/#newman2001
# mode 1 elements: 16726
# mode 2 elements: 22016
# two mode ties: 58595
# one mode ties: 47594
d <- fread("http://opsahl.co.uk/tnet/datasets/Newman-Cond_mat_95-99-two_mode.txt",
stringsAsFactors=TRUE, colClasses = "factor", header=FALSE)
# Transform data to a sparse matrix
A <- Matrix::sparseMatrix(nrow=length(unique(d[, V1])),
ncol=length(unique(d[, V2])),
i = as.numeric(d[, V1]),
j = as.numeric(d[, V2]),
x = rep(1, length(as.numeric(d[, V1]))) )
row.names(A) <- levels(d[, V1])
colnames(A) <- levels(d[, V2])
#To do the projection you have acutally multiple possiblities, here are two:
# Use base r
Arow <- tcrossprod(A)
# Alternatively, if you want to project on the other mode:
Acol <- tcrossprod(t(A))
Here is a overview how much memory got used, i.e. the sparse matrix approach worked on my laptop for this network, but the approach using regular matrices did give a memory allocation error (even after removing the Bcol
object from memory with rm(Brow)
and then calling the garbage collector gc()
)
object.size(A) # Spare matrix: 3108520 bytes
object.size(Arow) # 2713768 bytes
object.size(Acol) # 5542104 bytes
# For comparison
object.size(B <- as.matrix(A)) # Regular matrix: 2945783320 bytes
object.size(Brow <- tcrossprod(B)) # 2239946368 bytes
object.size(Bcol <- tcrossprod(t(B))) # Memory allocation error on my laptop
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With