I'm looking to join two dataframes based on a condition, in this case, that one string is inside another. Say I have two dataframes,
df1 <- data.frame(fullnames=c("Jane Doe", "Mr. John Smith", "Nate Cox, Esq.", "Bill Lee III", "Ms. Kate Smith"),
ages = c(30, 51, 45, 38, 20))
fullnames ages
1 Jane Doe 30
2 Mr. John Smith 51
3 Nate Cox, Esq. 45
4 Bill Lee III 38
5 Ms. Kate Smith 20
df2 <- data.frame(lastnames=c("Doe", "Cox", "Smith", "Jung", "Smith", "Lee"),
ages=c(30, 45, 20, 28, 51, 38),
homestate=c("NJ", "CT", "MA", "RI", "MA", "NY"))
lastnames ages homestate
1 Doe 30 NJ
2 Cox 45 CT
3 Smith 20 MA
4 Jung 28 RI
5 Smith 51 MA
6 Lee 38 NY
I want to do a left join on these two dataframes on ages and the row in which df2$lastnames is contained within df1$fullnames. I thought fuzzy_join might do it, but I don't think it liked my grepl:
joined_dfs <- fuzzy_join(df1, df2, by = c("ages", "fullnames"="lastnames"),
+ match_fun = c("=", "grepl()"),
+ mode="left")
Error in which(m) : argument to 'which' is not logical
Desired result: a dataframe identical to the first but with a "homestate" column appended. Any ideas?
You just need to fix match_fun:
# ...
match_fun = list(`==`, stringr::str_detect),
# ...
You had the right idea, but you went wrong in your interpretation of the match_fun parameter in fuzzyjoin::fuzzy_join(). Per the documentation, match_fun should be a
Vectorized function given two columns, returning TRUE or FALSE as to whether they are a match. Can be a list of functions one for each pair of columns specified in
by(if a named list, it uses the names in x). If only one function is given it is used on all column pairs.
A simple correction will do the trick, with further formatting by dplyr. For conceptual clarity, I've typographically aligned the by columns with the functions used to match them:
library(dplyr)
# ...
# Existing code
# ...
joined_dfs <- fuzzy_join(
df1, df2,
by = c("ages", "fullnames" = "lastnames"),
# |----| |-----------------------|
match_fun = list(`==` , stringr::str_detect ),
# |--| |-----------------|
# Match by equality ^ ^ Match by detection of `lastnames` in `fullnames`
mode = "left"
) %>%
# Format resulting dataset as you requested.
select(fullnames, ages = ages.x, homestate)
Given your sample data reproduced here
df1 <- data.frame(
fullnames = c("Jane Doe", "Mr. John Smith", "Nate Cox, Esq.", "Bill Lee III", "Ms. Kate Smith"),
ages = c(30, 51, 45, 38, 20)
)
df2 <- data.frame(
lastnames = c("Doe", "Cox", "Smith", "Jung", "Smith", "Lee"),
ages = c(30, 45, 20, 28, 51, 38),
homestate = c("NJ", "CT", "MA", "RI", "MA", "NY")
)
this solution should produce the following data.frame for joined_dfs, formatted as requested:
fullnames ages homestate
1 Jane Doe 30 NJ
2 Mr. John Smith 51 MA
3 Nate Cox, Esq. 45 CT
4 Bill Lee III 38 NY
5 Ms. Kate Smith 20 MA
Because each ages is coincidentally a unique key, the following join on only *names
fuzzy_join(
df1, df2,
by = c("fullnames" = "lastnames"),
match_fun = stringr::str_detect,
mode = "left"
)
will better illustrate the behavior of matching on substrings:
fullnames ages.x lastnames ages.y homestate
1 Jane Doe 30 Doe 30 NJ
2 Mr. John Smith 51 Smith 20 MA
3 Mr. John Smith 51 Smith 51 MA
4 Nate Cox, Esq. 45 Cox 45 CT
5 Bill Lee III 38 Lee 38 NY
6 Ms. Kate Smith 20 Smith 20 MA
7 Ms. Kate Smith 20 Smith 51 MA
The value passed to match_fun should be either (the symbol for) a function
fuzzyjoin::fuzzy_join(
# ...
match_fun = grepl
# ...
)
or a list of such (symbols for) functions:
fuzzyjoin::fuzzy_join(
# ...
match_fun = list(`=`, grepl)
# ...
)
Instead of providing a list of symbols
match_fun = list(=, grepl)
you incorrectly provided a vector of character strings:
match_fun = c("=", "grepl()")
The user should name the functions
`=`
grepl
yet you incorrectly attempted to call them:
=
grepl()
Naming them will pass the functions themselves to match_fun, as intended, whereas calling them will pass their return values*. In R, an operator like = is named using backticks: `=`.
* Assuming the calls didn't fail with errors. Here, they would fail.
To compare two values for equality, here the character vectors df1$fullnames and df2$lastnames, you should use the relational operator ==; yet you incorrectly supplied the assignment operator =.
Furthermore grepl() is not vectorized in quite the way match_fun desires. While its second argument (x) is indeed a vector
a character vector where matches are sought, or an object which can be coerced by as.character to a character vector. Long vectors are supported.
its first argument (pattern) is (treated as) a single character string:
character string containing a regular expression (or character string for
fixed = TRUE) to be matched in the given character vector. Coerced byas.characterto a character string if possible. If a character vector of length 2 or more is supplied, the first element is used with a warning. Missing values are allowed except forregexpr,gregexprandregexec.
Thus, grepl() is not a
Vectorized function given two columns...
but rather a function given one string (scalar) and one column (vector) of strings.
The answer to your prayers is not grepl() but rather something like stringr::str_detect(), which is
Vectorised over
stringandpattern. Equivalent togrepl(pattern, x).
and which wraps stringi::stri_detect().
Since you're simply trying to detect whether a literal string in df1$fullnames contains a literal string in df2$lastnames, you don't want to accidentally treat the strings in df2$lastnames as regular expression patterns. Now your df2$lastnames column is statistically unlikely to contain names with special regex characters; with the lone exception of -, which is interpreted literally outside of [], which are very unlikely to be found in a name.
If you're still worried about accidental regex, you might want to consider alternative search methods with stringi::stri_detect_fixed() or stringi::stri_detect_coll(). These perform literal matching, respectively by either byte or "canonical equivalence"; the latter adjusts for locale and special characters, in keeping with natural language processing.
This seems to work given your two dataframes:
Edited as per comment by @Greg:
The code is adpated to the data as posted; if in your actual data, there are more variants expecially to last names, such as not only III but also IV, feel free to adapt the code accordingly:
library(dplyr)
df1 %>%
mutate(
# create new column that gets rid of strings after last name:
lastnames = sub("\\sI{1,3}$|,.+$", "", fullnames),
# grab last names:
lastnames = sub(".*?(\\w+)$", "\\1", lastnames)) %>%
# join the two dataframes:
left_join(., df2, by = c("lastnames", "ages"))
fullnames ages lastnames homestate
1 Jane Doe 30 Doe NJ
2 Mr. John Smith 51 Smith MA
3 Nate Cox, Esq. 45 Cox CT
4 Bill Lee III 38 Lee NY
5 Ms. Kate Smith 20 Smith MA
If you want lastnamesremoved just append this after %>%:
select(-lastnames)
EDIT #2:
If you don't trust the above solution given massive variation in how last names are actually noted, then of course fuzzy_join is an option too. BUT, the current fuzzy_join solution is not enough; it needs to be amended by one critical data transformation. This is because str_detect detects whether a string is contained within another string. That is, it will return TRUE if it compares, for example, Smith to Smithsonian or to Hammer-Smith - each time the string Smith is indeed contained in the longer names. If, as will likely be the case in a large dataset, Smith and Smithsonian happen to have the same ages the mismatch will be perfect: fuzzy_join will incorrectly join the two. The same problem arises when you have, e.g., Smith and Smith-Klein of the same age: there too fuzzy_join will join them.
The first set of problematic cases can be resolved by including word boundary achors \\b in df2. These assert that, for example, Smith must be bounded by word boundaries to either side, which is not the case with Smithsonian, which does have an invisible boundary to the left of Smithsonian but the right-hand anchor is after its last letter n. The second set of problematic cases can be addressed by including a negative lookahead after \\b, namely \\b(?!-), which asserts that after the word boundary there must not be a hyphen.
The solution is easily implemented with mutate and paste0 like so:
fuzzy_join(
df1, df2 %>%
mutate(lastnames = paste0("\\b", lastnames, "\\b(?!-)")),
by = c("ages", "fullnames" = "lastnames"),
match_fun = list(`==`, str_detect),
mode = "left"
) %>%
select(fullnames, ages = ages.x, homestate)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With