Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to combine the outputs of multiple naive bayes classifier?

I am new to this.

I have a set of weak classifiers constructed using Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC) in Sklearn toolkit.

My problem is how do I combine the output of each of the NBC to make final decision. I want my decision to be in probabilities and not labels.

I made a the following program in python. I assume 2 class problem from iris-dataset in sklean. For demo/learning say I make a 4 NBC as follows.

from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB

import numpy as np
import cPickle
import math

iris = datasets.load_iris()

gnb1 = GaussianNB()
gnb2 = GaussianNB()
gnb3 = GaussianNB()
gnb4 = GaussianNB()

#Actual dataset is of 3 class I just made it into 2 class for this demo
target = np.where(iris.target, 2, 1)

gnb1.fit(iris.data[:, 0].reshape(150,1), target)
gnb2.fit(iris.data[:, 1].reshape(150,1), target)
gnb3.fit(iris.data[:, 2].reshape(150,1), target)
gnb4.fit(iris.data[:, 3].reshape(150,1), target)

#y_pred = gnb.predict(iris.data)
index = 0
y_prob1 = gnb1.predict_proba(iris.data[index,0].reshape(1,1))
y_prob2 = gnb2.predict_proba(iris.data[index,1].reshape(1,1))
y_prob3 = gnb3.predict_proba(iris.data[index,2].reshape(1,1))
y_prob4 = gnb4.predict_proba(iris.data[index,3].reshape(1,1))

#print y_prob1, "\n", y_prob2, "\n", y_prob3, "\n", y_prob4 

 # I just added it over all for each class
pos = y_prob1[:,1] + y_prob2[:,1] + y_prob3[:,1] + y_prob4[:,1]
neg = y_prob1[:,0] + y_prob2[:,0] + y_prob3[:,0] + y_prob4[:,0]

print pos
print neg

As you will notice I just simply added the probabilites of each of NBC as final score. I wonder if this correct?

If I have dont it wrong can you please suggest some ideas so I can correct myself.

like image 413
kcc__ Avatar asked Oct 20 '25 05:10

kcc__


2 Answers

First of all - why you do this? You should have one Naive Bayes here, not one per feature. It looks like you do not understand the idea of the classifier. What you did is actually what Naive Bayes is doing internally - it treats each feature independently, but as these are probabilities you should multiply them, or add logarithms, so:

  1. You should just have one NB, gnb.fit(iris.data, target)
  2. If you insist on having many NBs, you should merge them through multiplication or addition of logarithms (which is the same from mathematical perspective, but multiplication is less stable in the numerical sense)

    pos = y_prob1[:,1] * y_prob2[:,1] * y_prob3[:,1] * y_prob4[:,1]

    or

    pos = np.exp(np.log(y_prob1[:,1]) + np.log(y_prob2[:,1]) + np.log(y_prob3[:,1]) + np.log(y_prob4[:,1]))

    you can also directly predit logarithm through gnb.predict_log_proba instead of gbn.predict_proba.

    However, this approach have one error - Naive Bayes will also include prior in each of your prob's, so you will have very skewed distributions. So you have to manually normalize

    pos_prior = gnb1.class_prior_[1] # all models have the same prior so we can use the one from gnb1

    pos = pos_prior_ * (y_prob1[:,1]/pos_prior_) * (y_prob2[:,1]/pos_prior_) * (y_prob3[:,1]/pos_prior_) * (y_prob4[:,1]/pos_prior_)

    which simplifies to

    pos = y_prob1[:,1] * y_prob2[:,1] * y_prob3[:,1] * y_prob4[:,1] / pos_prior_**3

    and for log to

    pos = ... - 3 * np.log(pos_prior_)

    So once again - you should use the "1" option.

like image 149
lejlot Avatar answered Oct 21 '25 18:10

lejlot


The answer by lejlot is almost correct. The one thing missing is that you need to normalize his pos result (the product of the probabilities, divided by the prior) by the sum of this pos result for both classes. Otherwise, the sum of the probabilities of all classes will not be equal to one.

Here is a sample code that test the result of this procedure for a dataset with 6 features:

# Use one Naive Bayes for all 6 features:

gaus = GaussianNB(var_smoothing=0)
gaus.fit(X, y)
y_prob1 = gaus.predict_proba(X)

# Use one Naive Bayes on each half of the features and multiply the results:

gaus1 = GaussianNB(var_smoothing=0)
gaus1.fit(X[:, :3], y)
y_log_prob1 = gaus1.predict_log_proba(X[:, :3])

gaus2 = GaussianNB(var_smoothing=0)
gaus2.fit(X[:, 3:], y)
y_log_prob2 = gaus2.predict_log_proba(X[:, 3:])

pos = np.exp(y_log_prob1 + y_log_prob2 - np.log(gaus1.class_prior_))
y_prob2 = pos / pos.sum(axis=1)[:,None]

y_prob1 should be equal to y_prob2 apart from numerical errors (var_smoothing=0 helps reducing the error).

like image 25
hsxavier Avatar answered Oct 21 '25 18:10

hsxavier