I have a table called 'apple' and I wrote the following query:
select name,
count(name),
case when istasty is null then false else istasty end
from apple
group by name, istasty;
This the output:

I am trying to group the name and istasty flag using following condition:
tala has both true and false istasty column. However, I want to return false because it has atleast one false istasty column. istasty column for a particular name column is true then return true; Similarly, if all istasty column is false, then return false for that particular name column.I can achieve using the bool_and operator in postgresql by writing the query:
select name, count(name), bool_and(coalesce(istasty = true, false)) from apple group by name;

Is there any way I can modify my first query so that I add filter in having clause to achieve the same result as I got using bool_and operator in second query? Or is there any other possible way?
Please note I am not using bool_and operator. I appreciate your time. Thank you.
An alternative to using the bool_and operator would be regular conditional aggregation:
SELECT
name,
COUNT(*) AS count,
CASE WHEN SUM(CASE WHEN !istasty THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) > 0
THEN FALSE ELSE TRUE END AS result
FROM apple
GROUP BY name;
I am not sure what you have in mind when you suggest using the HAVING clause. By moving the conditional check to the HAVING clause you may exclude/include specific groups in the query matching the condition.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With