Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

In C, should inline functions in headers be externed in the .c file?

Tags:

c

inline

I've seen a few questions addressing this general topic, but I'm still unsure exactly what the correct approach is for ISO C, and how that may or may not vary from GNU C.

If I have some function inline void foo() in file.h defined with the inline keyword, should I also declare that function in file.c as extern void foo();? Assume that multiple .c files will include file.h.

From what I've read the answer seems to be "yes" and have something to do with how the compiler looks for definitions emitted by other translation units, but to be honest I don't fully understand the implications.

I'm working on a project right now that has a lot of functions declared inline within the header files, and none of those functions are declared in the corresponding .c files. Everything compiles without gcc complaining, but is this approach actually correct?

like image 206
Evan Avatar asked Sep 01 '25 10:09

Evan


1 Answers

Yes, if you use inline without static, there needs to be an actual external definition of the function somewhere in case the compiler declines to inline it in one or more places. The canonical way to do that is to make a source file containining (using your example names) nothing but:

#include "file.h"
extern void foo();

Personally, I find extern inline semantics in C confusing and messy, and prefer to avoid them entirely by making all inline functions static. Of course this wastes space with multiple instantiations of the function if the compiler declines to inline, but you should not be doing this with functions of nontrivial size anyway.

like image 153
R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE Avatar answered Sep 04 '25 05:09

R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE