It would be nice if Rust's Option provided some additional convenience methods like Option#flatten and Option#flat_map, where flatten would reduce an <Option<Option<T>> to Option<T>, and flat_map would work like map, but takes a method/closure that returns an Option and flattens it.
flat_map is pretty straightforward:
fn opt_flat_map< T, U, F: FnOnce(T) -> Option<U> >(opt: Option<T>, f: F) -> Option<U> {
match opt {
Some(x) => f(x),
None => None
}
}
flatten is more complex, and I don't really know how to go about defining it. It might look something like:
fn opt_flatten<T, U>(opt: Option<T>) -> Option<U> {
match opt {
Some( Some(x) ) => flatten_option( Some(x) ),
_ => opt
}
}
But that certainly doesn't work. Any thoughts?
Also, how would I go about implementing these methods on the Option enum, so that I can use them natively on an Option instance? I know I need to add the type signature in somewhere around impl OptionExts for Option<T>, but I'm at a loss...
Hope this makes sense and I apologize for my imprecise terminology--I'm brand new to Rust.
These probably already exist, just as different names to what you expect. Check the docs for Option.
You'll see flat_map more normally as and_then:
let x = Some(1);
let y = x.and_then(|v| Some(v + 1));
The bigger way of doing what you want is to declare a trait with the methods you want, then implement it for Option:
trait MyThings {
fn more_optional(self) -> Option<Self>;
}
impl<T> MyThings for Option<T> {
fn more_optional(self) -> Option<Option<T>> {
Some(self)
}
}
fn main() {
let x = Some(1);
let y = x.more_optional();
println!("{:?}", y);
}
For flatten, I'd probably write:
fn flatten<T>(opt: Option<Option<T>>) -> Option<T> {
match opt {
None => None,
Some(v) => v,
}
}
fn main() {
let x = Some(Some(1));
let y = flatten(x);
println!("{:?}", y);
}
But if you wanted a trait:
trait MyThings<T> {
fn flatten(self) -> Option<T>;
}
impl<T> MyThings<T> for Option<Option<T>> {
fn flatten(self) -> Option<T> {
match self {
None => None,
Some(v) => v,
}
}
}
fn main() {
let x = Some(Some(1));
let y = x.flatten();
println!("{:?}", y);
}
Would there be a way to allow flatten to arbitrary depth
See How do I unwrap an arbitrary number of nested Option types?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With