I have a function f(), that returns a std::pair<A, B> with some types A and B. And I have another function g(), that calls f() twice and returns a std::tuple<A, B, A, B>. Is there a way to construct the return tuple directly from both calls to f()? So I would like to shortcut the last three lines of my current code:
std::tuple<A, B, A, B>
g(type1 arg1, type2 arg2, ...) {
// perform some preprocessing
auto pair1 = f(...);
auto pair2 = f(...);
return { pair1.first, pair1.second, pair2.first, pair2.second }
}
into a one liner (instead of three). It would be nice, if that solution also worked with tuples of arbitrary length, especially in a template situation.
For example, in current Python3, the solution would be return (*f(...), *f(...)). Is there a similiar list/tuple unwrap operator in C++ as there is in Python?
std::tuple is not required by the standard to ever be standard-layout. Every std::pair<T, Y> is standard-layout if both T and Y are standard-layout. It's a bit easier to get the contents of a pair than a tuple . You have to use a function call in the tuple case, while the pair case is just a member field.
(since C++11) Class template std::tuple is a fixed-size collection of heterogeneous values. It is a generalization of std::pair. If std::is_trivially_destructible<Ti>::value is true for every Ti in Types , the destructor of tuple is trivial.
Yes, there is std::tuple_cat. Even though cppreference says that...
The behavior is undefined if any type in [arguments] is not a specialization of
std::tuple. However, an implementation may choose to support types (such asstd::arrayandstd::pair) that follow the tuple-like protocol.
I've tested it and all major standard library implementations (libstdc++, libc++, and MSVC's library) do support it.
Example:
#include <tuple>
struct A {};
struct B {};
std::pair<A, B> foo() {return {};}
std::tuple<A, B, A, B> bar()
{
return std::tuple_cat(foo(), foo());
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With