Does anybody know how to express: "constrain the generic so it must be a union with a certain type (in this case: null)"?
type Test<value_T extends Enforce_null_union>
Test<number | null> // Valid
Test<string | null> // Valid
Test<number> // Invalid, must be a union containing `null`
Test<number> // Invalid, must be a union containing `null`
With a similar idea than Nadia's answer, this should also work (playground):
type Test<T extends (null extends T ? unknown : never)> = T
We can see a pattern here: T extends S -> T extends (validation ? S : never)
With S = unknown if we don't want any particular constraint on T (other that meeting the validation).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With