I've been trying to crack this problem: https://codility.com/programmers/task/common_prime_divisors/
I have it functioning in terms of returning correct answers but it's incredibly slow for larger numbers, I wanted to see if anyone has a better taken on doing it faster or explaining ways I can optimize it.
bool IsPrime(int number)
{
for (int i = 2; i < number; i++)
{
if (number % i == 0)
{
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
bool GetPrimeFactors(int valueA, int valueB)
{
if(valueA < 0 || valueB < 0)
return false;
int max = sqrt(std::max(valueA, valueB)) + 1;//sqrt(std::max(valueA, valueB));
std::vector<int> factors;
bool oneSuccess = false;
for(int i = 2; i <= max; i++)
{
bool remainderA = valueA % i == 0;
bool remainderB = valueB % i == 0;
if(remainderA != remainderB)
return false;
if(IsPrime(i))
{
//bool remainderA = valueA % i == 0;
// bool remainderB = valueB % i == 0;
if(remainderA != remainderB )
{
return false;
}
else if(!oneSuccess && remainderA && remainderB)
{
oneSuccess = true;
}
}
}
return true;
}
int solution(vector<int> &A, vector<int> &B) {
int count = 0;
for(size_t i = 0; i < A.size(); i++)
{
int valA = A[i];
int valB = B[i];
if(GetPrimeFactors(valA, valB))
++count;
}
return count;
}
You do not actually have to find the prime factors of the numbers to decide if they have the same prime factors.
Here is a general algorithm that I thought up for checking if a and b have the same prime factors. This will be much quicker than prime factoring a and b.
a == b, the answer is true.a == 1 || b == 1, the answer is false.GCD == 1, the answer is false.GCD will need to contain all of the prime factors of both numbers for the answer to be true, so check if newa = a/GCD and newb = b/GCD can be reduced to 1 by repeatedly dividing them by Euclid(newa, GCD) and Euclid(newb, GCD) until newa and newb reach 1 which is success, or Euclid(newa, GCD) or Euclid(newb, GCD) returns 1 which is a fail.
Let's see how this works for a = 75, b = 15:
1) GCD = Euclid(75, 15) = 15
2) newa = 75/15 = 5, newb = 15/15 = 1, done with newb
3) newa = 5/Euclid(5, 15) = 5/5 = 1 success!
How about a = 6, b = 4:
1) GCD = Euclid(6, 4) = 2
2) newa = 6/2 = 3, newb = 4/2 = 2
3) Euclid(newa, 2) = Euclid(3, 2) = 1 fail!
How about a = 2, b = 16:
1) GCD = Euclid(2, 16) = 2
2) newa = 2/2 = 1 (that's good), newb = 16/2 = 8
3) newb = 8/Euclid(8, 2) = 8/2 = 4
4) newb = 4/Euclid(4, 2) = 4/2 = 2
5) newb = 2/Euclid(2, 2) = 2/2 = 1 success!
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With