I have a type that depends on a template template parameter:
template<typename X_, template<typename, typename> class Y_>
struct A { /*...*/ };
which I construct with a factory function:
template<typename X_, template<typename, typename> class Y_>
A<X_, Y_> make() {
return A<X_, Y_> { /*...*/ };
};
Now, I would like to add a factory function that takes an A by reference and assigns to it without me having to restate its template parameters:
template<typename A_>
void make(A_& a) {
a = make<typename A_::X, typename A_::Y>();
}
I added two template aliases to A to achieve this:
template<typename X_, template<typename, typename> class Y_>
struct A {
using X = X_;
template <typename... T>
using Y = Y_<T...>;
/* ... */
};
and then I try compiling:
A<int, std::vector> v;
make(v);
which yields, see Godbolt:
<source>: In instantiation of 'void make(A_&) [with A_ = A<int, std::vector>]':
<source>:24:11: required from here
<source>:18:9: error: 'typename A<int, std::vector>::Y' names 'template<class ... T> using Y = class std::vector<T ...>', which is not a type
18 | a = make<typename A_::X, typename A_::Y>();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do not understand why GCC 9.2 does not agree with me that Y is a type.
How should I communicate my intensions to the compiler correctly?
It is not typename but template you should use:
template<typename A_>
void make(A_& a) {
a = make<typename A_::X, A_::template Y>();
}
In addition
template<typename X_, template<typename, typename> class Y_>
struct A {
using X = X_;
template <typename... T>
using Y = Y_<T...>;
/* ... */
};
Y and Y_ are not equivalent, you need
template <typename T1, typename T2>
using Y = Y_<T1, T2>;
And I think it is only since C++17 they would be equivalent then.
Demo
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With