I am confused with borrowing and ownership. In the Rust documentation about reference and borrowing
let mut x = 5; { let y = &mut x; *y += 1; } println!("{}", x); They say
println!can borrowx.
I am confused by this. If println! borrows x, why does it pass x not &x?
I try to run this code below
fn main() { let mut x = 5; { let y = &mut x; *y += 1; } println!("{}", &x); } This code is identical with the code above except I pass &x to println!. It prints '6' to the console which is correct and is the same result as the first code.
The macros print!, println!, eprint!, eprintln!, write!, writeln! and format! are a special case and implicitly take a reference to any arguments to be formatted.
These macros do not behave as normal functions and macros do for reasons of convenience; the fact that they take references silently is part of that difference.
fn main() { let x = 5; println!("{}", x); } Run it through rustc -Z unstable-options --pretty expanded on the nightly compiler and we can see what println! expands to:
#![feature(prelude_import)] #[prelude_import] use std::prelude::v1::*; #[macro_use] extern crate std; fn main() { let x = 5; { ::std::io::_print(::core::fmt::Arguments::new_v1( &["", "\n"], &match (&x,) { (arg0,) => [::core::fmt::ArgumentV1::new( arg0, ::core::fmt::Display::fmt, )], }, )); }; } Tidied further, it’s this:
use std::{fmt, io}; fn main() { let x = 5; io::_print(fmt::Arguments::new_v1( &["", "\n"], &[fmt::ArgumentV1::new(&x, fmt::Display::fmt)], // ^^ )); } Note the &x.
If you write println!("{}", &x), you are then dealing with two levels of references; this has the same result because there is an implementation of std::fmt::Display for &T where T implements Display (shown as impl<'a, T> Display for &'a T where T: Display + ?Sized) which just passes it through. You could just as well write &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&x.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With