Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Can we use GetEnumerator() without using IEnumerable interface?

Tags:

c#

ienumerator

I have a class called Primes and this class implements GetEnumerator() without implementing IEnumerable interface.

public class Primes
{
    private long min;
    private long max;

    public Primes()
        : this(2, 100)
    {
    }

    public IEnumerator GetEnumerator()
    {...}

I don't get it. Am I missing something?

like image 321
Bon_chan Avatar asked Nov 25 '25 21:11

Bon_chan


2 Answers

Firstly, as others have said you can introduce your own methods without implementing interfaces anyway - you can write your own Dispose method without implementing IDisposable etc. For well-known interfaces I'd suggest this is almost a bad idea (as readers will have certain expectations) but it's entirely valid.

More importantly though, the foreach statement in C# can work without IEnumerable being involved. The compiler effectively does compile-time duck typing on the names GetEnumerator(), Current and MoveNext(). This was primarily to allow strongly-typed (and non-boxing) iteration in C# 1, before generics. See section 8.8.4 of the C# 3 spec for more details.

However, it's generally a bad idea to do this now if you do want to be able to easily iterate over the contents of an instance as a collection - and indeed I'd suggest implementing IEnumerable<T> instead of just IEnumerable.

like image 149
Jon Skeet Avatar answered Nov 28 '25 10:11

Jon Skeet


yes you can. even you can use it in foreach. The only problem that objects of this class can't be cast to IEnumerable although they implement needed method.

like image 20
Andrey Avatar answered Nov 28 '25 10:11

Andrey



Donate For Us

If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!