I'm going to guess the answer to this question will be "no," but it would be so nice, I'm going to ask anyways.
What I'm trying to do is freeze an element inside a scrollable DIV such that it stays in place vertically. This is to implement a frozen row feature in a table.
It's pretty easy to do with JavaScript and absolute positioning. Here's the HTML for a container and three inner DIVs (see here for the live version):
<div id="container">
<div id="background">
Content
</div>
<div id="absolutediv">
Absolute stays inside
</div>
<div id="fixeddiv">
Fixed escapes!
</div>
<div id="absolutediv2">
Stays put!
</div>
</div>
The relevant CSS:
#container {
position: fixed;
left: 20px;
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
top: 20px;
overflow: scroll;
}
#absolutediv {
position: absolute;
top: 30px;
width: 300px;
background-color: #CEC;
}
#fixeddiv {
position: fixed;
top: 100px;
width: 300px;
background-color: #ECC;
}
#absolutediv2 {
position: absolute;
width: 300px;
top: 120px;
background-color: #ECC;
}
And JavaScript that will hold #absolutediv2 in place:
var div = document.getElementById('absolutediv2');
var container = document.getElementById('container');
container.addEventListener('scroll', function() {
div.style.top = container.scrollTop + 120 + 'px';
});
So #absolutediv2 is behaving the way I want. But look at #fixeddiv. This gets close to what I'm after, and I suspect it looks nicer on mobile devices because the browser can hold it in place without waiting to run the script. Except that it (a) runs right over the borders, and (b) doesn't scroll horizontally.
Is there any way to get what I'm after with pure CSS, something that would run well on a mobile browser?
(In my page, one way to do this would be to place the frozen row above the container DIV, but the number of frozen rows changes depending on where the user has scrolled to, meaning that the container DIV would have to move around.)
Edit:
To sum up, I want a div that:
The last one is the tricky bit. I can achieve #1, #2, and #3 with an absolute-position div and JavaScript, but it looks ugly on a mobile browser because it lags. Using a fixed-position div, I can get #2 and #4, and I can achieve #1 with JavaScript (the lag doesn't bother me so much horizontally), but not #3, because a fixed-position div suddenly sits on top of its container.
Google has a suggestion for this kind of thing, but it's a pretty extreme solution: https://developers.google.com/mobile/articles/webapp_fixed_ui
Ok, I haven't tested this but it should be along the right track. Basically this gives you the ability to create multiple "Sticker" items with the HTML5 data attribute I created for you data-special="sticker"
. The jQuery looks for these, then copies the data and appends it to another <div>
element that is positioned where the original was, then it hides the original.
#container {
position: fixed;
left: 20px;
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
top: 20px;
overflow: scroll;
}
#original-element {
position: absolute;
top: 30px;
width: 300px;
background-color: #CEC;
}
.sticker {
position:absolute;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="container">
<div id="background">
Content
</div>
<div id="original-element" data-special="sticker">
I want to stay put!
</div>
</div>
</div>
$("[data-special='sticker']").each(function () {
$('#wrapper').append(
$('<div/>').html($(this).html())
.addClass("sticker")
.css('top', parseInt($('#container').css('top')) + parseInt($(this).css('top')))
.css('left', $('#container').css('left'))
.css('width', $('#container').css('width'))
.css('background-color', $(this).css('background-color'))
);
$(this).css('display', "none");
});
Let me know how it works for you, also one downside to this is once the original element is hidden, the space it used to take up is then collapsed... I'll try to brainstorm a solution for that.
Edit:
Changed the JS to get the #container
width instead of the original element width as the original element is larger that the container.
Edit:
Tested: jsfiddle
Some issues would be that the element will then also overlap the scroll bar, if you knew the width of that you could then subtract if from the value.
Also check the updated code above. There were some errors...
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With